[NLPL Task Force (A)] EOSC nordic

[Abdulrahman Azab]

Hi Stephan,

Thank you for your response! 

Actually the NLPL pilot/team doesn't "need" to provide input for this deliverable. The reason for adding a section for NLPL is that it would be useful for the PMB and other project members to know/learn about the experience of NLPL regarding workload submission to HPC systems. Do they use SSH only? what are the pros and cons? are there plans for using a more user friendly tools in the future? etc.

If the NLPL team would not like to share this experience, this is fine. I can just write the NLPL workloads use SSH connections

BR,
Abdulrahman
________________________________________
From: Stephan Oepen <oe at ifi.uio.no>
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2020 8:48 PM
To: Andrei Kutuzov
Cc: infrastructure; Adil Hasan; Abdulrahman Azab
Subject: Re: EOSC nordic

hi andrey,

i am copying adil and abdulrahman for clarification.

> Today at the EOSC-Nordic WP5 T5.2 Zoom meeting, Abdulrahman asked about
> the current status of the NLPL part in something called "D5.2 Cross
> borders computing through portals".
>
> I do not know anything about this :) So I promised to get in touch with
> Jörg or Stephan. This is section 5 of this document:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OqxZcv9BqD8Pm04rndpVx9a3SnXrXYlg2kFfqR-0RnE/edit#

i would not think we have anything to contribute to this deliverable?
the cross-border portal work is in sub-task T5.2.1, where neither of
the two NLPL partners is involved.  there are no portals in our
community; NLPL researchers work at the command line.

not sure whether you actually have access to the full project
proposal?  i attach it below; the NLPL use case is exclusively
involved in sub-tasks T5.2.2 (virtual laboratories), T5.2.3 (platform
as a service), and T5.3.1 (integrated data management).

best wishes, oe